Misleading practices in the world of digital advertising have become increasingly prominent. For example, 17% of global ad impressions in April-June 2022 were found to be fraudulent.
But the industry has more to worry about than fraudulent impressions, with misleading advertising another major cause for concern. Misleading advertising, which can range from exaggerated claims to outright falsehoods, poses a serious challenge to consumer trust and the integrity of the advertising industry itself.
To understand more about misleading advertising, the tactics behind them and their impact, we’ve compiled a list of examples. These examples highlight the importance of ethical advertising practices and the need for vigilance against deceptive tactics in an industry where honesty is crucial.
What Is Misleading Advertising?
Misleading advertising refers to the use of fraudulent or deceptive information in digital or traditional marketing to influence consumer behavior in a way that they wouldn't have otherwise. This type of advertising can compel consumers to make purchases based on incorrect or misleading information.
False or misleading advertising can take various forms, including omitting crucial product or service information, and it applies across different advertising mediums such as magazines, catalogs, physical and digital advertisements, and websites.
But this is not just about outright lies or false claims. It can also involve more subtle forms of deception, such as presenting information in a way that the average consumer is likely to misinterpret, using small print to hide important terms, or making comparative claims without a clear basis.
5 Misleading Advertising Examples
Renowned automotive brand Volkswagen faced significant legal challenges owing to its misleading advertising practices. The core issue revolved around its "clean diesel" campaign, which falsely advertised certain VW and Audi diesel vehicles as environmentally friendly and compliant with emissions standards.
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) revealed that Volkswagen's claims of low-emission, environmentally-friendly diesel cars were based on the use of a "defeat device”. This device manipulated emissions testing, making the vehicles appear compliant with environmental standards when, in reality, they were not.
This deceptive practice led to a massive false advertising case, resulting in Volkswagen's agreement to a settlement that included significant financial compensation for affected car owners and lessees.
Deceptive advertising, as in Volkswagen's case, is not just a rare occurrence but a serious issue in the industry. It highlights the importance for brands to maintain honesty and transparency in their advertising. Misleading consumers can lead to severe legal repercussions, financial losses, and reputational damage.
The consequences for Volkswagen were substantial. It faced a record-breaking fine, with the FTC announcing a partial settlement that required Volkswagen to return as much as $10 billion to the owners and lessees of affected vehicles. Not to mention, Volkswagen's reputation suffered a significant blow, eroding consumer trust and tarnishing the brand's image globally.
2. Red Bull
Red Bull is a globally recognized energy drink brand known for its catchy slogan, "Red Bull gives you wings”. The brand has built a strong presence in the market through its unique marketing strategies and sponsorships of various high-energy sports and events.
In a notable case, Red Bull faced a class action lawsuit over its advertising claims. Benjamin Careathers, David Wolf, and Miguel Almaraz filed the lawsuit, alleging that Red Bull falsely advertised its energy drinks as offering specific functional benefits, such as improved physical performance and reaction time, that persuaded consumers to pay a premium price for the product. The plaintiffs argued that these claims were deceptive and lacked scientific backing.
Red Bull agreed in 2014 to pay $13 million to settle the lawsuit, although the company denied any wrongdoing or liability. As part of the settlement, affected consumers who had purchased a Red Bull product since January 1, 2002, were eligible for a $10 cash payment or a coupon worth $15 in Red Bull products. The company maintained that its marketing and labeling had always been truthful and accurate, and the settlement was to avoid the cost and distraction of litigation.
While Red Bull remains a popular brand, this lawsuit brought attention to the need for more transparency in advertising claims. The case serves as a reminder for brands to carefully consider the accuracy of their marketing messages and the potential impact on their reputation and consumer trust.
Kellogg Co., a prominent name in the breakfast cereal industry, faced federal charges for falsely advertising the benefits of its Frosted Mini-Wheats cereal. The FTC announced that Kellogg had agreed in 2009 to settle these charges, which centered around misleading claims in their advertising.
Kellogg's national TV ads claimed that eating Frosted Mini-Wheats could improve children's attentiveness by around 20% compared to those who skipped breakfast. However, the FTC found that these claims were exaggerated. The study the ads referenced showed that only about half of the children experienced any improvement in attentiveness, and only 11% saw the 20% improvement claimed in the ads.
This incident serves as a reminder of how important it is for brands to back up their advertising claims with credible data, especially when they relate to health benefits. Misleading advertising can lead to significant legal consequences and damage to a brand's reputation.
For Kellogg, this case resulted in it needing to adjust its marketing strategies and reinforce the importance of maintaining integrity in advertising. It also served as a reminder to the industry about the potential consequences of overstepping the boundaries of truthful advertising.
4. Johnson & Johnson
Multinational Johnson & Johnson is known for its wide range of consumer goods, medical devices, and pharmaceutical products. Among its most iconic products is Johnson's Baby Powder, a staple in many households for decades.
Johnson & Johnson faced significant controversy over its Baby Powder product. The company was accused of targeting specific demographics, particularly African-American and overweight women, for its talc-based Baby Powder. This strategy was pursued despite emerging concerns about the product's safety.
Targeting specific demographics is a common marketing practice. However, when it involves a product with potential health risks, it raises ethical concerns. Companies must balance marketing strategies with the responsibility to provide accurate information about their products, especially when there are health implications.
Numerous lawsuits were filed against Johnson & Johnson, alleging that its Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products caused ovarian cancer or mesothelioma. A Reuters investigation further revealed that small amounts of asbestos had been found in the company’s talc products, information that was not disclosed to the public or regulators. This led to a significant public backlash and legal battles, with Johnson & Johnson facing thousands of lawsuits that eventually prompted it to discontinue talc-based baby powder.
L'Oréal, a global leader in the cosmetics industry, is known for its extensive range of beauty and skincare products. The brand has established a strong presence worldwide, catering to a diverse consumer base with its innovative and quality products.
In 2014, L'Oréal faced scrutiny over its advertising claims for two of its skincare products: Lancôme Génifique and L’Oréal Paris Youth Code.
The company marketed these products as being "clinically proven" to "boost genes”, leading to "visibly younger skin in just seven days”. These bold health claims caught the FTC’s attention, which challenged their validity.
The beauty and skincare industry often sees exaggerated claims about product benefits. However, L'Oréal's case was significant owing to the specificity of the claims about genetic enhancement and rapid, visible results. Such assertions, especially when lacking scientific backing, can mislead consumers.
The FTC's investigation concluded that L'Oréal's claims were "false and unsubstantiated”. As a result, L'Oréal USA was barred from making future anti-aging claims without solid scientific evidence. While the company avoided a monetary fine, it faced the risk of paying up to $16,000 for each future violation.
The above examples are some of the most notorious cases of misleading advertising from some of the world’s biggest brands.
Each case study provided insight into how these brands faced legal and reputational challenges. From Volkswagen's emissions scandal to L'Oréal's exaggerated skincare claims, each case underscores the importance of honesty and transparency in advertising.
Misleading advertising can have far-reaching consequences, not just for consumers who may be swayed by false claims but also for the brands themselves. Legal repercussions, financial penalties, and loss of consumer trust are just some of the potential outcomes.
If you're an AdSense or GAM publisher looking for premium demand partners, then get in touch with us here at Publift.
Publift offers a full-service solution to publishers and developers with an emphasis on optimizing mobile and desktop ad revenue. Helping more than 350 publishers across 60 countries since 2015, our partners have increased their ad revenue by up to 55% on average.
What Is the Most Famous Misleading Advertising Example?
One of the most famous examples of misleading advertising is the Volkswagen emissions scandal. This case gained widespread attention owing to the scale of the deception and the prominence of the brand involved. Volkswagen admitted to using software in their diesel vehicles that cheated on emissions tests, misleading both the consumer and regulators.
Is Misleading Advertising Unethical?
Yes, misleading advertising is unethical because it deceives consumers and can lead to uninformed or harmful decisions. Ethical advertising should be transparent, truthful, and provide accurate information to help consumers make informed decisions.
What is the Punishment for Misleading Advertisements?
The punishment for misleading advertisements can include fines, legal settlements, and, in some cases, criminal charges. The severity of the punishment typically depends on the extent of the deception and the laws of the country where the advertisement was published.